Test audience screenings 7/30 & 12/8 (Spoilers)
Re: Test audience screening 7/30 (Spoilers)
I am actually interested in a spoiler of sorts: what exactly is Max's new backstory? How does it differ from his original story and in what way was he at fault?
-
- Posts: 268
- Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 2:26 pm
Re: Test audience screening 7/30 (Spoilers)
Nothing is specified.pauli77 wrote:I am actually interested in a spoiler of sorts: what exactly is Max's new backstory? How does it differ from his original story and in what way was he at fault?
"...and it was here in this blighted place, he learned to live again."
Re: Test audience screening 7/30 (Spoilers)
Is it possible that in this universe, Max was born after the apocalypse?
- smegma crazy2
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 11:09 am
Re: Test audience screening 7/30 (Spoilers)
blackmocco any chance you could say how long into the movie max is captured..
-
- Posts: 268
- Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 2:26 pm
Re: Test audience screening 7/30 (Spoilers)
But how does this explain the appearance of the Interceptor, a link to the 'old' world and the previous movies...? Or Max being at the very least the same age, possibly even younger than Imperator Furiosa...? Had Mel been playing Max some of these factors wouldn't be questions as it would be very clearly set a long time after the events of Thunderdome.BRC1974 wrote:Is it possible that in this universe, Max was born after the apocalypse?
I could only suggest you watch the trailer again.smegma crazy2 wrote:blackmocco any chance you could say how long into the movie max is captured..
"...and it was here in this blighted place, he learned to live again."
-
- Posts: 166
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 12:11 pm
Re: Test audience screening 7/30 (Spoilers)
The positive reviews are very encouraging. But I find that I am a more harsh critic than most, so it remains to be seen...
As for flashbacks, hmmmmm..... well, they could definitely recycle key footage of MM1, MM2 and MM3 showing his various loses, hardships, etc. at key times. Jessie being run down, warrior woman being killed so violently (shot and run over), woman being raped, people being burned at the stake, dog being shot, car being destroyed (loss of dog and car are obviously limited by this being a reboot... grrrrr). A monologue at the beginning could really set this film up the way it deserves... Insert these memories at key times, and wow we have an awesome film. I can't shake the feeling that this movie is automatically not as good due to the reboot versus a pure sequel/prequel...
As for the idea of mutant lizards and people... the idea of the gilled woman in WaterWorld comes to mind and that movie was total garbage. When was the last major mutation for any known animal, reptile, or human? Thousands of years ago... hundreds of years ago... ??? Modern mutations (like conjoined twins, or a goat with an extra head, or animals with two tails) generally don't survive long except in a non-harsh environment. Yet in the MM world a decade after the war we have mutations? Okay, I can get on board if the mutations are minor and make sense. Hoping we don't see silliness like the irradiated giant or mutated lizards and crickets and people we saw in the 1960 black and white films! LOL. Max is simply too young to be BOTH from the former normal world as a cop AND transplanted far into the future Post apocalypse. We shall see...
Organ harvesting may be done BECAUSE THERE IS A MEDICAL DEMAND AND ABILITY TO USE THEM in modern times. Cutting the organ out in proper and sterile form and throwing it on ice would be difficult in the MM4 desert. And a kidney/arm/liver/heart/eye/etc. is of no use unless you have modern sterile equipment, cleaned operation areas, trained surgeons, unlimited blood and time for the operation and recovery, reliable electricity, ability to address complications, etc. It will be nonsense if we have some modern ER doing liver transplants and eye replacement surgeries...
As for flashbacks, hmmmmm..... well, they could definitely recycle key footage of MM1, MM2 and MM3 showing his various loses, hardships, etc. at key times. Jessie being run down, warrior woman being killed so violently (shot and run over), woman being raped, people being burned at the stake, dog being shot, car being destroyed (loss of dog and car are obviously limited by this being a reboot... grrrrr). A monologue at the beginning could really set this film up the way it deserves... Insert these memories at key times, and wow we have an awesome film. I can't shake the feeling that this movie is automatically not as good due to the reboot versus a pure sequel/prequel...
As for the idea of mutant lizards and people... the idea of the gilled woman in WaterWorld comes to mind and that movie was total garbage. When was the last major mutation for any known animal, reptile, or human? Thousands of years ago... hundreds of years ago... ??? Modern mutations (like conjoined twins, or a goat with an extra head, or animals with two tails) generally don't survive long except in a non-harsh environment. Yet in the MM world a decade after the war we have mutations? Okay, I can get on board if the mutations are minor and make sense. Hoping we don't see silliness like the irradiated giant or mutated lizards and crickets and people we saw in the 1960 black and white films! LOL. Max is simply too young to be BOTH from the former normal world as a cop AND transplanted far into the future Post apocalypse. We shall see...
Organ harvesting may be done BECAUSE THERE IS A MEDICAL DEMAND AND ABILITY TO USE THEM in modern times. Cutting the organ out in proper and sterile form and throwing it on ice would be difficult in the MM4 desert. And a kidney/arm/liver/heart/eye/etc. is of no use unless you have modern sterile equipment, cleaned operation areas, trained surgeons, unlimited blood and time for the operation and recovery, reliable electricity, ability to address complications, etc. It will be nonsense if we have some modern ER doing liver transplants and eye replacement surgeries...
Re: Test audience screening 7/30 (Spoilers)
...Nothing at all? So it just mentions he had a daughter?blackmocco wrote:Nothing is specified.pauli77 wrote:I am actually interested in a spoiler of sorts: what exactly is Max's new backstory? How does it differ from his original story and in what way was he at fault?
Sorry, I realise they're probably going to add the intro and stuff and not everything is in the test screening.
Re: Test audience screening 7/30 (Spoilers)
Another review from the screening via AICN. Some spoilers.
http://www.aintitcool.com/node/68296I know what happens when you give George Miller hundreds of millions of dollars to make a contemporary MAD MAX sequel. It may take a few years, and countless days, hours, seconds of anticipation, but it'll get completed into a full, exhibitable feature film. And baby, it's a thing of beauty.
The film starts out with the shot you've seen of Max's back and the two-headed lizard, before launching right into a chase where Rockatansky is eventually bested and caught. Max is taken to a citadel run by Immortan Joe, the masked, decrepit warlord worshipped by his devout slaves and a handful of captains, led by Furiosa (Charlize Theron). When Furiosa goes rogue and appears to be hijacking a rig (and its contents) for herself, Immortan Joe sends his army after them. Max only gets involved because one of Joe's footsoldiers, Dux (Nicholas Hoult), straps him to the hood of his car as his "blood bank," literally syphoning off his blood to increase his adrenaline. Through a series of events, Max ends up fighting alongside Furiosa and her cargo, Immortan Joe's bevy of young, gorgeous "breeders" (read: wives), including Joe's crown jewel, a quite-pregnant Rosie Huntington-Whitely. Cue the batshit vehicular mayhem.
This is the movie many of us always dream about, and rarely ever actually get. By that I mean this is a huge, multi-hundred-million-dollar production done by a major Hollywood studio that is both grand and odd, epic and intimate, crowd-pleasing and self-indulgent.
It's not uncommon to see one-time greats falter when given free reign and a limitless budget. Whether they're out of touch with contemporary demands, or that they just don't have the drive they once did, a bunch of directors (Lucas, Cimino, De Palma, Coppola) have hurt their legacies by putting out later films that failed to live up to the promise of their earlier work.
This did not happen with George Miller.
FURY ROAD is just as weird, bombastic, and MAD MAX-y and you'd want a MAD MAX movie to be. Sure, it's apparently PG-13, and Max himself has the least amount of dialogue (and is given the least to do) of the whole series, but there's no doubt this movie is cut from the same cloth. From the chrome Immortan Joe sprays on the teeth of the more worthy of his warriors to the guitar-playing minstrel live-scoring the car chases while harnessed to a moving car, FURY ROAD is permeated with the kind of bizarro world-building that keep the first three so distinctive amidst the wide range of post-apocalyptic action/sci-fi out there. Furiosa, Immortan Joe, and especially Nicholas Hoult's fanatical, half-mad Dux are extremely captivating, original characters; every moment with Dux, the first sorta-sympathetic henchman of the entire series, is striking and surprising, and adds a nice layer to the MAD MAX mythos. Charlize also deserves a ton of credit, both for her take-no-shit, grease-painted asskickery and for still being the most luminous female in the movie with a bald head and head-to-toe dirt and alongside dolled-up supermodels half her age. Furiosa is as much the hero of this movie as Max, and Charlize manages to make you forget she's an international superstar and believe she's an armless, carved-from-an-engine-block Road Warrior.
You'll hear many describe the film as "one long chase scene," and while that's not entirely true (nor would many of us want it to be), it's understandable why it comes across as such. It has such a breakneck pace, only stopping to linger on plot details very briefly and seldomly, that it does kind of feel like one sustained set-piece for the 2-hour running time. Once Furiosa takes off with her rig, the tension never lets up, and the film starts alternating between ROAD WARRIOR's epic vehicular madness and SORCERER-style, "Is something about to happen right now?" slow-burn intensity. I wouldn't dare reveal any more about the joys of the film, except to say that the storm scene you've seen in the trailer really does achieve a sort of mythic beauty in and of itself. But it comes relatively early, and the film's got plenty of gas left in the tank at that point, so don't think that's the end-all-be-all of the movie's action.
I'm not sure whether this movie's going to "set the world on fire," as my buddy said he thought it will, but the people who are going to love this movie are going to LOVE this movie. As a fan of the series, I was hoping for something that (unlike, say, INDY 4) could sit alongside the rest of the series as a worthy entry in Miller's ouvre. FURY ROAD cleared that high bar like it had springs for legs, and transcended into rarified territory: a blockbuster with balls, a pulse, and an unwillingness to do anything safe, all from within the confines of a PG-13 rating. This is a great movie, guys. I really can't wait 'till we can sit around and talk about it with the giddiness and glee I had last Monday.
- Nightwalker
- Posts: 1342
- Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 9:43 am
- Location: In a country that's 26% below sea level.
Re: Test audience screening 7/30 (Spoilers)
Damn, that's going to be a loooooooong 10 months.
The story is getting revealed bit by bit.
The story is getting revealed bit by bit.
"UNDERSTEER" is when you hit the fence with the front of the car.
"OVERSTEER" is when you hit the fence with the rear of the car.
"HORSEPOWER" is how fast you hit the fence.
"TORQUE" is how far you take the fence with you.

"OVERSTEER" is when you hit the fence with the rear of the car.
"HORSEPOWER" is how fast you hit the fence.
"TORQUE" is how far you take the fence with you.
